
It must have reached its boiling point and Samawa, a quiet town south of
Baghdad, just broke loose. Quiet dissent transformed into mayhem with the
town’s usually calm streets turning into scenes of uproar and anarchy.
Samawa has never been a hotbed of insurgency. But it was the residents’ cry
for services that suddenly moved the populace to ‘rebel’, in their own way,
out into the streets.
The pandemonium was largely undirected and uncoordinated but that basically
was what should make the Samawa case a matter of concern for every administrator.
Civil unrest can happen anywhere in Iraq at any given time. Lawlessness is
just around the corner. Quick police action quelled the riots although it
cost one death and injuries to dozens of protesters.
But the incident definitely does not end there. It could be just the beginning.
Lack of services can make an entire town lose control. It breeds lack of
trust in a people supposed to be placing their faith in some mode of governance,
or some entity that can keep things in order. Hapless Samawa citizens saw
nothing of that. They sensed nothing of a functioning government that promised
them basic necessities. Thus the only alternative left apparently was to
take to the streets.
Ironically the Samawa residents staged the uprising just as US secretary
of state Condaleezza Rice was announcing in Washington that the insurgency
in Iraq was losing steam. Hers was a debatable statement. Insurgents were
just on their murderous rampage last month with casualties claiming the lives
of Arab diplomats and more than a dozen US marines.
Upon closer look, the steam of insurgency in Iraq may actually be boiling
hot. The non-delivery of basic services long promised by the forces that
deposed Saddam is only feeding the rebellion to win more allies to their
side.
Samawa becomes a test case and the message this incident brings to policy-makers
in Iraq – including Rice, the boys from Washington and Iraqi politicians
– is that fighting insurgency is not the sole mission of the day. Fighting
insurgency by force can only be effective with a concomitant policy to provide
the basic services to a people supposedly ‘liberated’ from a tyrant. Any
deadline to secure peace must be matched with every deadline to restore to
the community the provision of basic services such as power, water and food.
At the rate things are going in Iraq, and at the poor rate the services are
being provided, the danger of insurgency lurks in the occupied country. The
danger of armed resistance to the US-guided government can occur regardless
of political blocs, religious affiliations or ethnic groupings. Any community
long deprived of its needs can become an army of guerrillas overnight.
Discontent as they say is the mother of all rebellions. |